In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 8 May 2011 05:52:04 -0700: Hi, [snip] >More like 6 minutes than 6 months - for nanopowder degradation from current >flow.... > This may be relevant. http://mpac.engr.ucdavis.edu/publications/FAS1.PDF
> > >-----Original Message----- >From: mix...@bigpond.com > >>As I understand the dynamics of this situation, one cannot pass a current >>through a nanopowder without promoting instant agglomeration - which over >>time proceeds progressively back into a bulk conductor. > > >...perhaps that's why it needs to be replaced after 6 months? > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > > > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
