Scott,
Sorry for the late response but found a couple small nits to
pick. I am ok with your synopsis for a moving plate [snip] we are left with
a net radiation pressure of the larger waves outside of the cavity that act
only on the outside of the cavity, pushing the one-moveable plate toward the
other. [/snip] but for the case of two "immovable" plates that are braced
apart the pressure on the outside portion of the wavelength causes the
interior portion to defract onto a different angle relative to the time axis
allowing it to fit between the plates even while it appears to get shorter
from our perspective outside the cavity.
I liked the points you made but in your last paragraph you misspoke the
Haisch and Moddel theory as the "hydrino" theory instead of "Lamb Pinch"
which their theory is based upon - your description was otherwise insightful
-just hung the wrong label on it.
Regards
Fran
_____
From: Wm. Scott Smith [mailto:scott...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 5:03 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; j...@tao.org.uk; Fran Roarty; Francis Roarty
Subject: Relativistic Casimir Cavities
The Casimir Effect is often explained by the example of two grounded, metal
plates that are separated by a very small distance, usually, 100 to a 1000
nm separation. Small frequencies of the electromagnetic quantum flux of the
Quantum Vacuum or Zero-Point Energy field exist both inside the "cavity"
between the two plates as well as outside of the cavity. Therefore, these
small waves exert the same amount of radiation pressure on both sides of
each plate; however, the em waves that do not fit inside the cavity without
grounding out on the plates do not exert radiation pressure inside the
cavity; therefore, we are left with a net radiation pressure of the larger
waves outside of the cavity that act only on the outside of the cavity,
pushing the one-moveable plate toward the other.
Other interpretations include such things as explaining Van de Waals forces
in terms of London Force, but on a larger distance scale, then explaining
Casimir Forces in terms of adjusting the Van de Waals Theory (which is
already quite a stretch) to explain the yet larger distances in the Casimir
Experiment.
A third explanation says that the Quantum Vacuum becomes polarize, the
virtual photons acting perpendicular to the two plates.
Francis and I are investigating a fourth explanation that is a sort of
Inverse Relativity wherein, due to Lorentz Invariance, we believe that the
same wavelengths exist INSIDE and outside the cavity (as do some of the
Vacuum-Polarization People) but that these frequencies are somehow blue
shifted so as to fit inside the cavity. But this seems odd to Francis and I
if one doesn't also account for relativistic contraction or dilation of
motion along the local time axis; in other words, the shortened oscillations
of these photons force some of their oscillation motion to be expressed in
their motion along the time axis. (We do not think in terms of time passing,
rather we think in terms of different object moving through time-space at
different rates, even though spatially they are right next to each other,
but one object is in the cavity and one is outside the cavity.
We predicted , for example, that radioactive gases would decay slower or
faster, according to various possible conditions inside of cavities made of
different material. This has been experimentally confirmed, independent of
us, and without a know connection to our Relativistic Cavity Theory.
Light can traverse these cavities seemingly in excess of c, but we argue
instead, that the speed of light is the same inside the cavity, but travel
along the time axis is accelerated.
Several Patent by Haisch discuss the possibility of cycling a gas into and
out of nano-spongeous array. When the orbitals contract, heat is given off.
They call this the hydrino theory and seemingly can be bothered with
considering the Relativistic possibilities. We further believe that this may
be part or all of the Anomalous Heat Phenomenon aka LENR, or "Cold Fusion."
One of my more recent posts discusses this from the standpoint of certain
Van de Graaf generator phenomena of like-charge clustering and Literal-Spin.
Scott
Wm. Scott Smith
Home 509 326 1307
Work 509 315 1194
Experiments have shown that
> From: j...@tao.org.uk
> Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 17:47:47 +0100
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: [Vo]:Casimir Cavities.
>
> Ok, I'm game. What is a Casimir Cavity? I'm sure it's been explained here
already, but probably in the middle of one of the amply populated threads. I
know the smallest part the theory of the Casimir effect. Is this related? Is
there a paper with a worked through example on Casimir Cavities that I can
consider to help me understand what's being discussed here?
>
> Joe
