>We know that they mean kilowatts. We know this is not standard. You are not >telling me or anyone else here anything we do not know, so I suggest you give >it a rest.
You didn’t get the point. What is wrong is that they means kilowatt but they talk about energy. Stremmeson used kwh/h (equals to kW) and wrote “energy produced”. That’s very wrong. From: Jed Rothwell Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 3:32 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: July 7th E-Cat test report Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com> wrote: Jed, i have a scientific degree. I know what are the unit of measuremnts. kWh/h, by semplification, is kW, is a unit of POWER. Using kWh/h for ENERGY is totally wrong. Totally. Open a physic book and study it. Yes, I am aware of this. I learned it in 8th grade as I recall. However, even though this notation is not standard, many people use it. To insist that it is "wrong" is pedantic. It is pointless. We know that they mean kilowatts. We know this is not standard. You are not telling me or anyone else here anything we do not know, so I suggest you give it a rest. In both common speech and scientific writing there are many forms of notation and many expressions that are irrational, redundant, obsolete, based on mistaken premises, or reversed in meaning. This is a fact of life. Human communication is imperfect. There is no need for you to tell us this. We know. - Jed
