It must make a big difference in noise and in heat production and in
fuel consumption if the generator is running without load.
It cannot go unnoticed if this was watched.
Am 29.10.2011 16:22, schrieb David Roberson:
It is prudent to have the generator running for safety reasons as well
as to supply the control system regulating the ECATs. I would find it
strange if they deactivated the generator. Also, the net fuel used
during the test is a direct indication of the amount of energy from
that source. This should be easy to determine.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Ectsnte <ecat0...@hotmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sat, Oct 29, 2011 8:00 am
Subject: [Vo]:500kW generator was also running during the 5 hours!
Is there any reason why there was a 500kW generator running AND hooked
up to the E-Cat through the WHOLE test, despite the E-Cat being
switched into "self-sustain" mode? I gave it a tiny percent chance of
being possible before, but now there's nothing but a clear scam left
of it.
"Power for start-up (resistive coils that provided heat to the
reaction chambers) was provided by the large and loud genset (was
making all the noise) you see that is nearly as large as the small
shipping container in which the 1 MW E-Cat plant was arranged. Once
the reaction chambers got up to temperature, they were maintained by
the heat produced by the reaction. I'm not sure why they kept the
generator running after that, but I would guess it was for back-up or
safety. I'm sure the engineers testing the system made sure what the
power levels were at all times."
"Probably the biggest opening for skeptics will be the continually
running genset that is probably rated for 500 kW (my guess), and
appears to have been connected by cables to the E-Cat."
Source: http://pesn.com/2011/10/28/9501940_1_MW_E-Cat_Test_Successful/
Anyone have an explanation? Thanks. Also, my first post here.
-Larry
