Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> However, this test was by no means made by independed scientists. > Well, supposedly it was. Rossi claims that was an independent engineer. We have only his word for that. > I take some words back. Rossi's calorimetry was not calibrated. Therefore > we do not have any proper evidence for the performance. I guess that there > was some excess heat, but nothing more accurate can be said. In a test on this scale, with this kind of equipment, HVAC engineers never calibrate. That is not part of their standard operating procedure. Do you expect them to bring in another 1 MW reactor? This is a little like expecting a bridge inspector to build another bridge next to the one being certified. HVAC engineers use industrial equipment that has been certified accurate by a testing agency. They have to, or they will lose their licenses. They assume the equipment gives the right answer, and it does. Assuming the report "TESTS TO PROOF THE LEONARDO 1 MW REACTOR . . ." is not a fraudulent, and it was written by a genuine, licensed HVAC engineer, there is not the slightest doubt the machine produce massive amounts of anomalous energy. It is not even one tiny bit debatable. And you can rule out a hidden wire that was not monitored, or gasoline. This was an enclosed area. They would have been asphyxiated with carbon monoxide. If that is a licensed engineer, perhaps we can look up the name in some on-line registry. If he wrote a fraudulent report he can easily lose his license and his livelihood. I really doubt it is fraudulent. By the way, that title is ungrammatical. So are many other parts of the document. I preserved them in the voice input transcription. The document was not written by a native speaker of English. The mistakes make me think it is a genuine document, written by an Italian HVAC engineer. Many American HVAC engineers I have met are not good at writing documents either. - Jed
