Dear Axil, what you say is more true for Piantelli who has created Transition Metals LENR.
Peter On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will remind the theorists among us again that Rossi states in his patent > that copper can be used as a micro powder material as an alternative to > nickel. This implies that the physical and/or chemical properties of Nickel > are not critical to the Rossi reaction. > > Rossi has surveyed many other transition metals to support his reaction. > He found that nickel performed the best but conversely the other transition > metals work almost as well. > > > Nano-engineering is all important in the Rossi process. This indicates to > me that the nuclear and/or chemical properties of the micro-metal are not > as important as the nano surface preparation of the micro-powder. > > In simple terms in my opinion, the topology of the nano-structures is what > makes the Rossi reaction go. Rossi calls this topology "tubules" and spent > six months working day and night to optimize this surface structure. > > The changing work functions of the varied polycrystalline structures of > these tubules will break apart H2 into H. Somehow inverse Rydberg matter > may be formed between and among these tubules with the help of the high > pressure and temperature of the hydrogen envelop and the mediating action > of an alkaline catalyst. > > When all those electrons and protons that comprise a inverse Rydberg > molecule are packed into the very small space between these surface > tubules, this set of subatomic particles gain a lot of energy… maybe from > Zero Point Energy…or just from the uncertainty principle. > > Dr. George Miley shows in his experiments and also in the Rossi ash, what > comes out of this process is a zoo of other transmuted elements all up and > down the periodic table. > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:44 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > >> Does anyone understand what happens to one of these fractional Rydberg >> hydrogen atoms once it is released into the atmosphere? Does it gain >> energy from the air and become standard hydrogen? I am just curious? >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Tue, Nov 1, 2011 1:41 pm >> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Mill's and Lu paper define hydrino as >> fractional Rydberg >> >> That is exactly what I was saying… Now that Mills admits the “hydrino” >> is actually fractiona Rydberg hydrogen the term hydrino not only becomes >> redundant but also carries all the baggage of his previously wrong >> definition that caused so much controversy. The term should be eradicated >> with extreme predjudice. >> >> *From:* Danny Ross Lunsford >> [mailto:antimatte...@yahoo.com<antimatte...@yahoo.com?>] >> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:28 PM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Mill's and Lu paper define hydrino as >> fractional Rydberg >> >> You can forget the hydrino. It does no good to adhere to bad ideas. >> Angular momentum conservation prevents it. We need to use good physics to >> get to the bottom of this phenomenon, and ruthlessly eliminate the bad >> ideas. >> >> *---------------------------------------------- >> "I write a little. I erase a lot." *- Chopin >> >> >> >> --- On *Tue, 11/1/11, Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>*wrote: >> >> A recent paper “Time-resolved hydrino continuum transitions with >> cutoffs at 22.8 nm and 10.1 nm” >> http://www.springerlink.com/content/q8005267210x3568/fulltext.pdf...<http://www.springerlink.com/content/q8005267210x3568/fulltext.pdf> >> >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
