Am 20.11.2011 15:23, schrieb Aussie Guy E-Cat:
More here:
http://radio.rcdc.it/wp-content/uploads/Focardi-english-version.pdf
Thank you. I have seen this before, but as an italian video with
english subtitles on youtube.
There is something that most coldfusion researchers say and Focardi says
it too:
He says, the "hot fusion guys" have not got /any/ results, but he has.
I believe this is a false exaggeration and a physics professor should
not say this.
It is *untrue*.
If any cold fusion reseacher could present the results of hot fusionists
it would be a worldwide sensation.
Of course the hot fusionists have /repeatable/ results in form of excess
energy and nuclear reaction products and radiation. They get this for
some millseconds at best, but/repeatable/.
What they dont have, is a sustained reaction and they have not reached
an energetic breakeven point.
But if any CF researcher could present results as the hot fusionists
already have, the reality of CF where already proven and accepted by
mainstream.
Peter
On 11/20/2011 10:48 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
In this TEDx event:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=eGmgTo2Kw1U#t=564s>
Focardi says, that no neutrons where observed.
Gamma radiation /not much above ambient level/ was observed.
So it seems they added the lead shield only for security, but not for
protection and thermalization.
This conflicts with Rossis statement that gamma radiation is
thermalized in the lead shield.
Gamma rays not much above ambient level cannot contribute a
measurable amount of thermal energy.
Peter
