Defkalion's CEO says about the 48 hours work condition in this paper.

If the E-cat has heated the office for two years, then it seems  later it
made serious  regress. You can show any photography, how could we know that
the thing heats indeed?
As regarding Prof Focardi who;
a) tacitly accepts the role of Father of Cold Fusion;
b) has told his old friend Piantelli- I cannot communicate more with you;
c) says that he does know what the wonder additive called catalyst is- that
translates to"Rossi does not trust me"
- I will not believe what he says about this mythical heater

I have never accused Rossi of fraud, I think yes he can obtain excess heat
but has not sufficient controil. But he lied a lot starting with the
catalyst, nad with saying that his process has nothing to do
with the fprmer Ni-H processes. The results of the experiments
were "improved", the methods of measurement were "optimized"


On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Jed, it seems there was a point in the contract, that the E-cat should
>> work continuously for at least 48 hours- and it didn't.
>
>
> Ah. You refer to the Sept. 6 test done by "Quantum engineers and NASA, but
> which fails due to leakage." Yes, Rossi's prototype equipment often fails
> because of leakage or some unknown problem. Defkalion says their reactors
> are more reliable.
>
>
The heating of
>> n office with an E-cat for 2 years is fairy tales for adults.
>>
>
> Except that someone recently mailed me photos of the damn thing, with
> people I know standing around it, and test data. Plus Focardi and others
> say they saw it running several times. So it is not a fairly tale. Every
> indication is that it is true.
>
> As I said, I have never caught Rossi telling a lie about any engineering
> technical claim. No skeptic has caught him, either, as far as I know. All
> of their examples of lies are their own misunderstandings. He says things
> about theory and transmutation that may not be true, but I would not call
> those statements "lies." I think he does not know much about theory. Since
> I know nothing, I cannot judge.
>
> As I mentioned, I am trying to get permission to upload those photos. It
> might help smooth the way for me to do that if people here would tone down
> these rabid accusations of fraud, made without a shred of evidence. It
> poisons the atmosphere. Expressing doubts is fine, but out-and-out
> accusations and calls by certain unnamed people to have Rossi arrested and
> deported are . . . unhelpful.
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to