A restatement and some new thoughts on black hole UFOs at CERN. This
is in response to the article about difficulties at the CERN LHC:
http://www.livescience.com/17207-ufos-disrupting-search-god-
particle.html
"...UFOs — unidentified falling objects, that is — keep getting in
their way."
"More than 10,000 possible UFO events — occasions when there were
proton-beam losses thought to result from UFOs blocking the protons —
were observed between April and August"
"Even more UFO events, and resulting beam dumps, happened at a point
in the beam just past objects called injector kicker magnets (MKIs),
suggesting that these magnets are a major source of the mystery
objects."
The UFOs could be black holes. One of the most profound predictions
of my gravimagnetic theory is that virtual photons carry no
gravitational charge. They have zero gravitational mass. Therefore,
black holes will accumulate magnetic fields corresponding to the sum
of the magnetic moments they consume. This could be useful for using
black holes as power supplies, in that they can be contained by an
actively controlled magnetic containment field.
It would be natural for black holes to accumulate in the vicinity of
magnets, especially at the ends of electromagnets where the field
strength and gradients are maximal. If they are accumulating at such
large distances, then the number of black holes being generated would
have to be huge. Further, their evaporation rate would have to be
slow to non-existent for such an accumulation to take place at a
large distance.
The biggest problem with this explanation of the UFOs is the
distance of the of the MKI's and beam origin from the target area.
The long range from the target area is probably actually necessary to
slow them down enough to be trapped by magnets. The bad news is they
necessarily accumulate a lot of matter along the way, reducing the
probability of a fast evaporation.
One of the most intimidating deductions from my gravimagnetic theory
was the prediction, mandated by symmetry, that black holes
continually increase in mass by separating mass charge pairs from
vacuum fluctuations. This process conflicts with the Hawking
Radiation theory, because the Hawking radiation theory does not take
into account the existence of negative gravitational mass charge.
Further, there is no Swartzchild radius for negative gravitational
charge matter. A matter pair of with opposed gravitational charge can
be separated anywhere within the black hole, with the negative
gravitational charge half being accelerated out of the black hole at
enormous energies. The interior of a black holes is likely a very
energetic place, having a large particle and photon flux, even if no
matter is accreting. This is due to mass manufacturing from the
vacuum. Charged pairs which are fully separated in the mix, and thus
have gravitational charge, are likely to recombine before the
negative mass particle can escape. However, due to their real mass
they will generate real photons upon annihilation. If either or both
of the annihilation photons has a negative mass charge, then it will
have a high probability of being quickly expelled from the black hole
due to a low probability to react with other identical escaping
photons. If the photon interacts with charged particles on the way
then it can split off into 3 photons, two of which have negative
gravitational mass, or create additional negative gravitational mass
real particle pairs from their extreme energies. A black hole with
even near Planck mass might not evaporate as predicted by Hawking,
but might actually continue to grow, while emitting massive amounts
of negative gravitational mass matter which is possibly mirror
matter, and which I called "cosmic matter" in my paper:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CosmicSearch.pdf
The nature of the matter so created depends on symmetry issues
discussed here:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/GravityPairs.pdf
By the gravimagnetic theory, cosmic matter is possibly, or even just
largely, mirror matter. Therefore the negative gravitational mass
issuing forth from ordinary mass black holes would have a very low
coupling factor with ordinary matter, and essentially would be
invisible. This goes for both the real matter and real photons
produced from the black hole. The black holes themselves would have a
high degree of interaction with ordinary matter in the vicinity
though, via their incredibly strong and continually growing B fields.
An x-ray response to a very powerful AC de-gaussing coil can be used
to detect black holes at CERN if they are indeed the UFOs.
If these things are true, then the tiny black holes that escape the
local magnets at CERN, especially when they are powered down, will
eventually head for the center of the earth. It will soon be all
over here on earth if the shutdowns are due to itinerant black holes,
and the black hole evaporation rate does not exceed the negative mass
charge generation rate for small black holes.
One problem with this theory, and the reason CERN proceeded despite
warnings from various scientists that black holes predicted from the
experiment could go rouge, is that cosmic rays with energies far
larger than what the LHC produces hit the earth daily. These should
be able to create small black holes also. They have not caused a
problem in billions of years, so why worry?
The answer as to why worry may lie in the fact that the CERN
collisions are mono-energetic. Normal collisions result in a vast
spray of particles. However, at just the right resonance energy, a
large portion of the energy may result in massive particles, black
holes, possibly even initiated, seeded, by the long sought Higgs
boson itself. The key to obtaining a black hole is achieving a large
enough particle density. Once that is initially achieved in a
collision, more mass accreting in to the black hole merely expands
its Swartzchild radius further, its volume, and thus its ability to
accrete more mass from any solid in which it resides and thus even
further increase its volume. If a singularity forms within a black
hole, regardless its mass, then a sufficient gravitational gradient
to create gravitational mass from the vacuum exists near the
singularity.
The bad news is that a failure to realize the danger of black holes
created at one or more beam resonance peaks may have set on course
the soon end to earth's existence. The good news is the Higgs may
have been generated in profuse numbers at some energy already
explored. The Higgs experiment may have been an unrecognized
success. Alternatively, some other massive and unexpected particle
may have been created.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
