I think more his +10 kW outputs with a few 100 watts in is hard to
question and that is which causes the stares and envy. As for
questionable methods, the 15 Jan test was done under the supervision of
the university professors and scientists. As Rossi said in the video, we
did the tests as they made suggestions and looked over our shoulders.
Sort of real time peer reviewed testing. If you then call Rossi's
methods questionable as used at the 15 Jan test, do you also call into
question all the scientists and professors methods that worked with
Rossi on the test?
On 12/11/2011 11:06 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
There are scientists that report much better results:
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/204israel.html
citation:
- Run #64b gave 1500% excess heat over a duration of 80 hours with a
total excess energy of 4.6 Megajoules
So, why do they all stare at Rossi and his poor COP and questionable
methods?
Peter
