Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > I'll comment on it: he went on to say, but it isn't fusion. > > That's apparently because he's swallowed, lock, stock, and sinker, > Widom-Larsen theory, and isolated, idiosyncratic attempt to "explain" > LENR by coming up with even more preposterous hypotheses, none of > which have been tested and shown to be of predictive value.
Abd, If you reject W-L theory, what would you regard as the most reasonable explanation for all of the transmutations reported? Is there a particular paper that you could recommend. I'm too overwhelmed by the complexity of solid state reactions to take any side in the controversy. Thanks, Lou Pagnucco
