Oh, nice! That's why he also congratulated you in that report. I didn't go to the talk or take part in the CMNS list, so I cannot know. I am happy that I got to similar conclusions as you did independently. Several people reaching the same conclusions, in similar ways, is a sign of things going into the right direction.
But I am still not sure how to get rid of the gamma rays. 2011/12/30 Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> > > On Dec 30, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > > Yes, it does makes sense. But I would suggest you to study Takahashi's > model. Your idea seems to work to explain what happens to the electrons in > Phase III of his theory, that is, when the tetrahedron collapses. It is not > clear to me what happens to the electrons. I pointed out Lerner's theory > because it is about ground state of Landau's quantization. Some time ago I > did this calculation, and at non relativistic regime around 10fm. The > magnetic field is around 10 trillion Tesla. Check it out. > > > If you look at the spread sheet I provided in 2007, you will see the > magnetic field of the electron on the deuteron in the D+e deflated state is > given as 4.0210e+14 T: > > http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FusionSpreadDualRel.pdf > > I was "there" when he first proposed this more recent version of his > theory. > > There is more to cold fusion than D+D-->He, or multiples thereof. > > Best regards, > > Horace Heffner > http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ > > > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
