Good grief. What is it with the Windom-Larson crowd? I mean while I'm skeptical that anyone has "the theory" to explain any of this yet, I will admit that Windom-Larson may be right. But still, why the religious wars? What's wrong with these people?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton > > > Another “rumorist” has written somewhere that our Customer has given > > us back the 1 MW E-Cat: this is another stupidity, totally false. > > Warm Regards, > > A.R. > > > Rossi sometimes plays word games. Jones did not claim that it was > "given back". His comment is more like it was "returned for repairs". > > That is correct. Not only that, Rossi has all the characteristics of a > pathological liar, and liars like to use "tense" to advantage. You know: > "the meaning of is". > > In this case he uses "has" or the past tense - when the BBB would be in > transit, if the 'rumorist' is right. Technically, it has not back *yet* but > that does not mean it is not "on the way back".... > > > "Given back" implies that a refund will be requested. Jones > implicated that there will be no such request. > > Yes, but AFAIK Rossi IS contractually obligated to eliminate the quiescence > problem. > > Can he do that now? If so, hats-off to Rossi ! > > But even if he can do this with better controls, and proves himself to be > close to the great inventor he imagines himself to be, he is still a liar. > We knew that back when Rossi "invented" a Board member, George Kelly, which > is a complete lie, one of hundreds, even borrowing the name of a deceased > faculty member at UNH. This is one of many needless fabrications, and > "needless" is a reason why this personality defect is pathological. > > Side note: Edison too was both a great liar and a great inventor; and also > shared Rossi's habit of "borrowing" ideas without attribution. He famously > promised Nikola Tesla the equivalent of over a $million to significantly > improve his DC generator, and when Tesla delivered, TAE reneged, saying: > “Tesla, you don’t understand our American humor”... leading Tesla to invent > AC. Poetic justice. But Tesla was "factually challenged" himself, so this > could be a common trait of many great inventors. > > > Rossi has admitted elsewhere that he is presently repairing the first > Mega-eCat with new gaskets and controls. > > Are you calling the "first Mega-eCat" the BBB? If so, you have > inadvertently > caught him in the lie already, no? Even if he is saying that he is > repairing > it on the customer's premises, the gist of the rumor, and the reason it > pains Rossi so severely - is that the BBB presently has zero economic > value. > Not to mention that this is also the reason that he missed out on the DGT > payment. > > Now we know there is a good reason for Rossi's ill-humor - 100,000,000 > million reasons. If he is repairing BBB on the customer's premises, and it > has not been returned, then yes I am guilty of spreading a partly > inaccurate > rumor on that detail only. > > But not on the main point that E-Cat does NOT work for extended periods > running - and moreover, has zero economic value until it does work for more > than a day or two. It never worked continuously for weeks or months to heat > a factory - that is another big lie. > > In the end, Rossi is still no more than a pathological liar on most of his > absurd claims, like the million unit factory. And if he wants to sue me for > libel - then all the better. (I understand the situation - his wife is an > Italian attorney). > > Unlike Italy, however, we have this little detail in the US court system > call "Discovery" and the aftermath of discovery for Rossi would completely > crush this man's gigantic over-inflated ego. > > Jones > > >
