Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> wrote: >
> But, I agree with her that some of the fanbois need to pull back a little, > too. This is one of the funniest things I've seen posted in a while: > > > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:13:54 -0500 > From: jedrothw...@gmail.com > ** > *"Rossi gives the appearance of lying more than he actually lies. He has* > *difficulty telling the truth in a way that does not make it look like a > lie." > * > - Jed > > . . . To make repeated, and often ridiculous, excuses for his actions is to do a > great disservice to those trying to make an informed analysis of his > actions. > What the hell is that supposed to mean?! You and Beene are both off your rockers on this. I am saying that Rossi cannot help making himself look like a liar. If that is "defending" what could I say that would be attack? If that is a compliment, what would an insult be? Rossi cannot bring himself to tell a simple truth in a way that is convincing. Even when he has the truth on his side, he makes it look like a lie. He also makes careless mistakes such as misidentifying where George Kelly works. He is an annoying person. However, as far as I know, he has not told many lies. I have not caught him telling any about the technical capabilities of his machines. As far as I know he has not lied, although it is obvious from the compendium of his statements that I compiled that he has contradicted himself, he is confused, and his statements do not conform to conventional theory. He has lied about various things, including me, so I am well aware that he does sometimes lie. He is too clever by half. The statements made by Beene may not be lies. He probably believes them. But some of them are completely wrong. I suppose it is pure speculation or unfounded rumors. It is irresponsible to post such things. It is tantamount to a lie, and no better than what Rossi does. - Jed
