Abd, I only want to ask your opinion on the unexpectedly low gamma radiation.
Let's assume we have a nanowire (or nano-"protrusion" on a nano-particle) with diameter of a few nanometers and (experimentally observed) carrying a huge 10^11 [Amp/cm^2] current density. Then would this nanowire be enveloped in an ultra-intense surface vortex plasmon of very high momentum electrons? If a gamma release occurred at, or below, the metal surface, could many gammas escape at their "birth" energies, or would Compton-effect collisions with the electron shroud deplete most of their energy? Thanks, Lou Pagnucco > At 11:53 PM 1/16/2012, you wrote: >>I asked a close >>friend (PhD physicist) and he said the same thing as Krivit; that fusion >[...] > Now, W-L theory predicts *lots* of transmutations. These are not > observed to be correlated with the heat. Transmutations are indeed > observed, but at levels way below that of helium. Further, gamma > emissions would be expected from neutron activation reactions from > any slow neutrons, not to mention "ultra low momentum" neutrons. The > gammas are not observed. W-L propose a totally novel mechanism for > gamma suppression, and, realize, this mechanism would have to be very > efficient, catching *lots* of gammas, yet the mechanism would only > cover, as proposed, the area of formation of "heavy electrons." there > would be edge effects, some gammas would escape. > > (Note that Larsen has patented a gamma ray shield based on this idea. > There is no published confirmation of any such effect, and Larsen has > never revealed any experimental evidence behind the claim. That such > a patent could be issued, while patents on "cold fusion" are rejected > as "impossible," like perpetual motion machines, is just an example > of how much damage the physics establishment did with its little > semantic error.) > > >
