Practically speaking, *power* on demand is what a user wants. Significant energy production would suggest that the device can supply power on demand. Most people have no use for the concept of *energy*, except theoretical fizzists and ultility companies who charge per unit of energy consumed.
harry On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Apparently Daniel, you are not clear on the difference between power and > energy? > > From: Daniel Rocha > > In the brochures, they state 10sKWs, not as spikes. For a so short deadline, > they must be lying and more else, don't know how to pull so much energy. > They also lied about knowing what is Rossi's method/catalyst. > > If they are so much behind expectations, why would they say 10KW or more for > each Hyperion? Are they lying? > No, in fact I would not be surprised if the spikes were not more than 10kW. > Mills' (Jansson) was showing 50 kW spikes, four or more years ago with a > similar reactor. > The problem as always, is progressing from kW to kW-hrs. > > There is no indication here that this has been accomplished or even > approached. > > J. > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >