>From Alain: > http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=177379
Note that the last paragraph states the following: > A plethora of theoretical models have been proposed to explain > several experimental anomalies in LENR. A brief description of > a weak interaction model shall be presented that claims to > explain almost ALL of the anomalous effects found so far. I like the term: "A BRIEF description of a weak interaction model will be presented..." Methinks these guys are holding their cards very close to the vest. This announcement does not strike me as outright recognition of the W-L theory as Krivit would seem to be insinuating and promoting. Note that Krivit's blog page states in bold letters: "CERN Recognizes LENRs, Widom-Larsen Theory" http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/02/08/cern-recognizes-lenrs-widom-larsen-theory/ Yeah, right. Neither does CERN's announcement strike me as an endorsement of the theory either. The W-L theory is only one of many possible theories for which CERN will BRIEFLY touch on. Nothing wrong with letting the W-L camp have their day in court. Be that as it may, I suspect Mr. Krivit would would have preferred that CERN had stated something to the effect that they are seriously investigating the merits of the W-L theory. I suspect from Krivit's POV it would help justify his on-going objective of promoting what appears to be a very strong personal belief that the W-L theory is the only way to go. Since CERN didn't actually say that they are recognizing or promoting the theory, looks to me like Krivit decided to put those words in their mouth. If I had been involved in running the CERN colloquium I think I would have been a little irked by Mr. Krivit's insinuations. PS: At 16h00 they will serve "Tea and coffee". Makes me wonder how they will heat the tea. ;-) Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
