Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: You can tell that WL theory does not fit experiments since it does not > predict the formation of He4 within a few hours of experiment.
W&L try to explain this discrepancy, don't they? > Thus, the constant attacks of Krivit on MacKubre's M4 experiment. That > experiment rules out, completely, WL theory. I understand Krivit's motivation for doing this, but I had the impression that W&L have a more sophisticated explanation. I have not looked closely at their work. If they say the helium data must be a mistake they are clearly wrong. It is one thing to claim the helium data is a mistake. It is quite another to claim it is fraud, as Krivit does. - Jed
