[quote]The intuition of Rossi (but his, Stremmenos too) to use Ni powder instead of Ni rods as stubbornly insisted Piantelli (trying to optimize the effect with adequate geometric forms) was based on the simple observation that transmutations take place only on the surface- ergo for increasing these effects clearly nuclear we have to increase the surface we have use powders of Ni or of some other transition metals konown to give the cold fusion effect due to their common crystalline structure.[endquote]
Some believe that it is the surface preparation of the Rossi micro-particles that cause transmutations to occur on the surface of the micro-powder. But in the Piantelli experiments, there is no micro-cavity surface preparation and transmutation still is restricted to the surface of the bulk material. The reaction rate of the Piantelli experiments is proportional to the surface area of the bulk material used. One way to explain the exclusivity of transmutations on the surface of the nickel powder/bar is that a powerful electrostatic field is projected onto the surface of the metal which provides a coulomb barrier screening mechanism directly to the top layers of the nickel atoms on the surface of the metal. This electrostatic field does not penetrate into the bulk of the micro powder which explains why transmutation to copper does not occur in the interior bulk of the powder. The source of this electric field is the coherent and highly polarized Rydberg molecules/crystals that float near the surface of the nickel. This dipole field is very powerful with a strength that can exceed 1,000,000,000,000 times the dipole strength of a hydrogen atom in the ground state. This power is provided by a 1000 atom crystal at a principle quantum excitation number of 100. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > a fast translation,dear Alain > > Peter Hagelstein says he thinks that Rossi’s generator is derived from > that of Piantelli. If that is true than his (Peter’s) physical models > developed for Pd-D are seeming to reproduce well for what is observed for > Ni-H systems. > > > > > > Stremmenos strongly disagrees says Rossi has realizws a huge increase of > the energy produced but also has contributed much > > at a qualitative level with the using of Ni powders and with the addition > of the catalyst which he keeps secret in justified mode. > > > > The intuition of Rossi (but his, Stremmenos too) to use Ni powder instead > of Ni rods as stubbornly insisted Piantelli (trying to optimize the effect > with adequate geometric forms) was based on the simple observation that > transmutations take place only on the surface- ergo for increasing these > effects clearly nuclear we have to increase the surface we have use powders > of Ni or of some other transition metals konown to give the cold fusion > effect due to their common crystalline structure. > > > > Rossi has had also the intuition that the low energetic yields (5-15 > Watts) for all the CF experiments are due to the low concentration of > atomic hydrogen which easily solves and interacts with the metal. H2, D2 > molecular hydrogen or deuterium were dominating and these are extremely > stable and insoluble both at the temperatures of the processes- > electrolytic or diffusive (start to dissociate only above 2100C)- in my > opinion, introducing a chemical catalyst (?) that lowers the dissociation > temperature you obtain plenty of atomic hydrogen that easily interacts with > Ni. > > > > For the discussion of other ideas and results coming (with a delay of at > least 15 years from the “prestigious MIT” via Prof Hagelstein > > I want to discuss about a) results coming not from the rich means of MIT > but from the more modest of UniBo b) experimental results of spectroscopic > measurements (Raman) of interest for Hagelstein as author of theories is > interested to study in depth for a confrontation of his opinion with mine- > that is only an opinion of an experimental physicist. > > > > N. T what he says about Piantelli is not true, the last paragraph > is not clear even in Greek – but it says something like “you can be smart > but I am even smarter > > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> just to add that this text from stremmenos seems linked to artcile >> by hagelstein , that also need to be translated(better than by MS or >> google translator) >> >> http://22passi.blogspot.com/2012/02/peter-hagelstein-sulla-fusione-fredda.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed >> >> >> http://22passi.blogspot.com/2012/02/peter-hagelstein-sulla-fusione-fredda_24.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed >> >> >> 2012/2/25 Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> >> >>> an article about an open letter by stremmenos after >>> a talk with Hagelstein. >>> talk about the way the theory proposed by focardi make >>> possible the developpemet of Ni+H reactors like rossi or DGT... >>> >>> http://22passi.blogspot.com/2012/02/stremmenos-interviene-proposito-di.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed >>> >>> for me it seems indirectly to support that rossi and DGT started from >>> Focardi ideas, not from inventing/stealing... >>> >>> anyway I could not translate it correctly with microsoft translator &al >>> >>> http://www.microsofttranslator.com/BV.aspx?ref=BVNav&from=&to=en&a=http%3A%2F%2F22passi.blogspot.com%2F2012%2F02%2Fstremmenos-interviene-proposito-di.html%3Futm_source%3Dfeedburner%26utm_medium%3Dfeed >>> >>> if someone can translate correctly >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >
