Yes - pretty expensive, but as Daniel Rocha points out, they might be able
to claim the $1M prize with an investment of $60,000.  Also, it's worth
noting that the nanoparticles are not pure Pd.  Perhaps, too, if Miley
were to accept the challenge, a Pd supplier might provide it just for
advertising value.  And, lastly, if the Miley group could win the $1M,
then they would probably be deluged with offers of investment money.

Also, let's not forget Miley also works with Ni-H - so an analogous cell
might work with nano-Ni as well.

Peter Gluck wrote:
> I hope that at the 25th Anniversary of CF, palladium will be history. Its
> limits are inherent and incurable.
> And it's its scarcity is annihilating the chances to
> be an important source of energy.
> 350W per kg...multiply it by 1000 and it starts to become interesting
> Peter
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:22 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote:
>
>> Corrections:
>> Title line should read "350W/Kg" - date is March 23 - session URL is
>> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess462.pdf
>>
>> Does anyone know whether Dick Smith's offer extends to Miley's lab, and
>> whether Miley would accept?
>>
>> Lou Pagnucco
>>
>> >
>> > A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
>> (LENRs)
>> > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3051.pdf
>> >
>> > To be presented March 22, at The Woodslands, TX at
>> > NETS (Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space meeting)
>> > http://anstd.ans.org/NETS2012/NETS2012Home.html
>> > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess301.pdf
>> >
>> > EXCERPT:
>> > Excess heat generation from our gas-loading LENR power cell (Figure 1)
>> has
>> > been verified, confirming nuc-lear reactions provide output energy.
>> While
>> > there are similarities between ours and the Rossi E-Cat gas-loaded
>> kW-MW
>> > LENR cells that have attracted inter-national attention, there are
>> > important differences in nanoparticle composition and cell
>> construction.
>> > Our experiment has established a remarkable proof-of-principle power
>> unit
>> > at ca. 350W/kg under room tem-perature when using deuterium (D2) gas
>> (H2
>> > can also be employed) with Pd rich nanoparticles, producing 1479J
>> heat,
>> > well above the maximum exothermal ener-gy (690J) possible from all
>> > conceivable chemical reac-tions (Figure 2). Neglecting unlikely
>> chemical
>> > reaction contributions, the energy gain is virtually unlimited due to
>> > negligible power input with gas loading! ...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>


Reply via email to