*As I wrote about a year ago, if this were real, the military would be all over it. Apparently they aren't. There are people informed who would inform the military.*
*http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/3616ideologies.shtml* Cold Fusion Versus LENR: Competing Ideologies By Steven B. Krivit** *The right government manager in the right spot could impose his agenda on the selection of the Rossi reactor over the LeClair reactor and hide the LeClair reactor under the rug.* * * *This retired government manager may have a current commercial relationship with Rossi. After all, a trillion dollars is good motivation. * * * *The Navy may be satisfying their interest in LENR through Rossi.* * * *I only know what is rumored on the NET. You are close to the tap root of LENR truth; what is your opinion?* * * * * On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>wrote: > Krivit is such a robot. He wrote: > http://blog.newenergytimes.**com/2011/01/31/new-energy-** > times-issue-36-letters/<http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/31/new-energy-times-issue-36-letters/> > > [Ed: I apologize for inappropriately attributing your word choice to your > educational background. I never believed you accomplished "fusion." You are > misstating facts. Based on what you described and have shown to me, I > believe you have accomplished a clear demonstration of low-energy nuclear > reactions. Your work appears worthy of much credit and support, though your > claim of fusion at room temperature does not. I applaud and support your > courage and persistence, and I encourage your continuing success.] > ----------------end of quotation from Steve Krivit----------------- > > Le Clair is explicitly claiming nuclear fusion, and claiming clear > evidence for that. It's not LENR, period, if the reports are true. And if > they are not true, it's serious delusion or worse. > > This is not "cold fusion" or LENR. Bubble fusion, which this would be, in > general, if it happens, is hot fusion, not LENR, and if Krivit doesn't know > that, he's been asleep for years, dreaming. > > Le Clair is claiming that LENR phenomena are really cavitation phenomena > inducing hot fusion. They aren't. If they were, the high neutron generation > rates that Le Clair is claiming would have been evident, it's called the > "dead graduate student effect." > > Le Clair came out more than a year ago with these reports. Nobody has > verified any of it. Some samples have apparently been analyzed that Le > Clair provided. Nothing unusual. > > As I wrote about a year ago, if this were real, the military would be all > over it. Apparently they aren't. There are people informed who would inform > the military. > >
