I had always believed that electrical arcs as a source of reactor heat was equivalent to the heat produced by hot filaments. One of these heat sources was as good as the other.
Now it has been revealed that a newly discovered negative potential causes an attractive force between the positive ions, which then form lattices. Because of this newly revealed value of degenerate electrons as a suspected enabler of the Rossi reaction, electric arcing may be a superior provider of heat. The more fast electrons we can pack into the hydrogen plasma envelope, the more productive the Rossi reaction might become. Regards: axil On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please allow me to make two more points. > > The paper says: *Summing up, we have discovered a new attractive force > between two ions that are shielded by degenerate electrons in an > unmagnetized quantum plasma.* > > > Axil says: > > It could be that when a magnetic field is applied to the plasma, this > attractive forse is disrupted and will negate both the proton cooper pairs > and the Rydberg ions. > > When DGT applies a magnetic field the degenerate electrons are disrupted > causing a failure of the Rossi reaction. > > Also, when the pressures of the hydrogen envelop is increased, this > enhances the production of degenerate electrons which increases the > associated power of the Rossi reaction. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Novel Attractive Force Between Ions in Quantum Plasmas >> >> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.5556.pdf >> >> This is the paper behind the article. >> >> This paper explains the theoretical basis of a new form of matter called >> ionic crystals. >> >> Ionic crystals are the agent that causes cold fusion. >> >> The article says: *Quantum plasmas extend the area of application to >> nano-scales, where quantum-mechanical effects gain significance. This is >> the case when, in comparison to normal plasmas, the plasma density is very >> high and the temperature is low.* >> >> Axil says: >> >> This is what we have in the Rossi type reactor. The hydrogen envelope is >> very high density plasma with a very low temperature. The population of >> degenerate electrons in this envelope is high due to the high pressure of >> the hydrogen gas. >> >> These degenerate electrons force Rydberg atoms together into a condensate >> and keep this condensate together when the crystal ionizes. >> >> These degenerate electrons produce a force field at long range that >> pushes protons together to form cooper pairs. This attractive electron >> field also forces naked positively charges nuclei together that have had >> their coulomb barrier stripped as described in my post titled “the magnetic >> monopole.” >> >> When these naked nuclei come into contact, the nuclear force takes over >> to form new elements. >> >> Degenerate electrons are attributable to the Pauli Exclusion Principle. >> The pressure maintained by a body of degenerate matter is called the >> degeneracy pressure, and arises because the Pauli principle prevents the >> constituent particles from occupying identical quantum states. Any attempt >> to force them close enough together that they are not clearly separated by >> position must place them in different energy levels. Therefore, reducing >> the volume requires forcing many of the particles into higher-energy >> quantum states. This requires additional compression force, and is made >> manifest as a resisting pressure. >> >> Therefore, since according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle ΔpΔx ≥ >> ħ/2 where Δp is the uncertainty in the particle's momentum and Δx is the >> uncertainty in position, then we must say that their momentum is extremely >> uncertain since the particles are located in a very confined space. >> Therefore, even though the plasma is cold, the electron must be moving very >> fast on average. This leads to the conclusion that if you want to compress >> an object into a very small space, you must use tremendous force to control >> its particles' momentum. >> >> This is what the micro-cavities in the micro powder do; compress >> electrons into the degenerate state. >> >> The article says: *The new negative potential causes an attractive force >> between the ions, which then form lattices.* >> >> Axil says: >> >> This is why Rydberg ions are formed so readily in a pressurized hydrogen >> envelope. >> The article says: *They are compressed and the distances between them >> shortened, so that current can flow through them much faster.* >> >> Axil says: >> >> This is why electrical resistances drops as the temperature increases in >> cold fusion material. >> >> >> >> >> >> * * >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint >> <zeropo...@charter.net>wrote: >> >>> Hi Fran,**** >>> >>> Reduced, or completely masked? Don’t know yet…**** >>> >>> It’s still ‘in press’ so I doubt PRL will have an abstract yet… **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> What’s interesting is this:**** >>> >>> “The new negative potential causes an attractive force between the ions >>> [of the plasma], which then form lattices. They are compressed and the >>> distances between them shortened, so that current can flow through them >>> much faster.”**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> So the (degenerate electron) quantum plasma forms **its own lattice**!? >>> A nano/micro-scale lattice of plasma… now that ought to have some >>> interesting properties being that the ions are much free-er (is that a >>> word?) that in condensed matter. If this plasma lattice encompasses the >>> first several layers of atoms in the condensed matter (Ni, Pd, etc), could >>> the compression of the plasma lattice physically force protons to cross the >>> Coulomb barrier?**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Could this be the nuclear active areas that LENR researchers have >>> discussed? A quantum plasma lattice juxtaposed or co-physical with a >>> condensed matter (metal) lattice… Obviously, it would take specific >>> conditions to bring this about, and on a small volume, and probably short >>> lived with the disruptive randomness of quantums of heat energy being >>> shuffled about inside the metal lattice. This quantum lattice could >>> certainly be the ‘collective oscillations’ that McKubre and others have >>> hypothesized… same phenomenon, different name. Or does the plasma ‘lattice’ >>> imply additional properties not considered by LENR researchers?**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> The other interesting clue which could be relevant to LENR is this:**** >>> >>> “Such plasmas …. can be produced artificially in the laboratory by >>> means of laser irradiation.”**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Remember that some LENR work (SPAWAR?) has looked at laser stimulation, >>> and it seemed to have a positive effect…**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> I think the problem with the lack of good theoretical basis for LENR >>> comes from the fact that we really are discovering an entirely new field of >>> physics, and there are numerous interactions that can occur… which just >>> serves to confuse things… too many effects to coordinate into a qualitative >>> model that can then be quantitatively explored and modeled. **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Truly exciting times! This will probably dwarf the importance of the >>> transition in understanding when going from the Bohr model of the atom to >>> quantum mechanics nearly 100 years ago.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> -Mark**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* Roarty, Francis X [mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:19 AM >>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >>> *Subject:* RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:New physical attraction between ions in >>> quantum plasmas**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Mark,**** >>> >>> Is this proof of a reduced coulomb barrier?**** >>> >>> Fran**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* MarkI-ZeroPoint >>> [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net<zeropo...@charter.net>] >>> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:08 PM >>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >>> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:New physical attraction between ions in >>> quantum plasmas**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Hot off the press!**** >>> >>> Not sure is this is relevant to LENR, but think it could be…**** >>> >>> *When ions get closer: New physical attraction between ions in quantum >>> plasmas* >>> >>> Quantum plasmas extend the area of application to nano-scales, where >>> quantum-mechanical effects gain significance. This is the case when, in >>> comparison to normal plasmas, the plasma density is very high and the >>> temperature is low. Then the newly discovered potential occurs, which is >>> caused by collective interaction processes of degenerate electrons with the >>> quantum plasma. Such plasmas can be found, for example, in cores of stars >>> with a dwindling nuclear energy supply (white >>> dwarfs<http://www.physorg.com/tags%0d%0a/white+dwarfs/>), >>> or they can be produced artificially in the laboratory by means of laser >>> irradiation <http://www.physorg.com/tags/laser+irradiation/>. The new >>> negative potential causes an attractive >>> force<http://www.physorg.com/tags/attractive+force/>between the ions, which >>> then form lattices. They are compressed and the >>> distances between them shortened, so that current can flow through them >>> much faster.**** >>> >>> The findings of the Bochum scientists open up the possibility of >>> ion-crystallization on the magnitude scale of an atom. They have thus >>> established a new direction of research that is capable of linking various >>> disciplines of physics. Applications include micro-chips for quantum >>> computers, semiconductors, thin metal foils or even metallic >>> nano-structures.**** >>> >>> *More information:* P. K. Shukla and B. Eliasson (2012): Novel >>> Attractive Force Between Ions in Quantum Plasmas, *Physical Review >>> Letters* 108, in press.**** >>> >>> < p class=MsoNormal>Gee, you mean there are still new things to >>> discover? Science still has things to learn? I’m being sarcastic here… >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> This is why when anyone, especially a scientist, states that something >>> isn’t possible because it contradicts laws of physics, they are just >>> flat-out wrong. ALL one is justified in ever saying in that situation is >>> that it’s very unlikely. if they don’t speak in probabilities, then they >>> are probably wed to their theories as much as any person is to their >>> religion… it’s ok to ‘not know’.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> -Mark**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >> >> >
