Here is the English report from the Japanese Parliament (Diet)
investigating committee:

http://naiic.go.jp/en/

Here are some interesting comments by Chairman Kurokawa in the Executive
Summary. Incidentally, I cannot find these comments in the Japanese version:

"THE EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI of March 11, 2011 were natural disasters of a
magnitude that shocked the entire world. Although triggered by these
cataclysmic events, the subsequent accident at the Fukushima Daiichi
Nuclear Power Plant cannot be regarded as a natural disaster. It was a
profoundly manmade disaster – that could and should have been foreseen and
prevented. And its effects could have been mitigated by a more effective
human response.

How could such an accident occur in Japan, a nation that takes such great
pride in its global reputation for excellence in engineering and
technology? This Commission believes the Japanese people – and the global
community – deserve a full, honest and transparent answer
to this question.

Our report catalogues a multitude of errors and willful negligence that
left the Fukushima plant unprepared for the events of March 11. And it
examines serious deficiencies in the response to the accident by TEPCO,
regulators and the government. . . .

. . . This conceit was reinforced by the collective mindset of Japanese
bureaucracy, by which the first duty of any individual bureaucrat is to
defend the interests of his organization. Carried to an extreme, this led
bureaucrats to put organizational interests ahead of their paramount duty
to protect public safety.

Only by grasping this mindset can one understand how Japan’s nuclear
industry managed to avoid absorbing the critical lessons learned from Three
Mile Island and Chernobyl; and how it became accepted practice to resist
regulatory pressure and cover up small-scale accidents. It was this mindset
that led to the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant."

Yup. Check, check . . .  So far so good. He goes on to say:

". . . This report singles out numerous individuals and organizations for
harsh criticism, but the goal is not—and should not be—to lay blame. The
goal must be to learn from this disaster, and reflect deeply on its
fundamental causes, in order to ensure that it is never repeated. Many of
the lessons relate to policies and procedures, but the most important is
one upon which each and every Japanese citizen should reflect very deeply.

The consequences of negligence at Fukushima stand out as catastrophic, but
the mindset that supported it can be found across Japan. In recognizing
that fact, each of us should reflect on our responsibility as individuals
in a democratic society . . ."


In other words, blame it on the people and the culture of Japan. Not the
specific nitwits who put the fuel tank on the the ground on the ocean side
of the reactor plant. The blame is nebulous, applying to everyone, and
therefore to no one. This was the same response the government had
immediately after the surrender in WWII. The message to the citizens and
schoolchildren was: "You people did not fight hard enough. You failed the
Emperor and the nation." The government was all set to impose more
hardships and more sacrifices on the people when the Occupation Authorities
arrived and overruled it.

Lawrence Forsley, who was at W&M, went to Fukushima to assist in some of
the technical analyses of nuclear products. I believe it was some months
after the accident. He said the officials and scientists there are lying
through their teeth, and the situation is much more dire than they admit.
That is what Mizuno and many other independent observers have said.
Kurokawa said the accident is continuing to the present day. Apparently, so
is the lying and the cover up. However, the cover-up is far from airtight.
A lot of information is leaking out.

A cover-up never works. A cover-up plus baseless anodyne assurances from
officials make the public assume the government and TEPCO say are lying.
People imagine the real situation is even worse than it actually turns out
to be. That was true even in Stalinist Russia.

- Jed

Reply via email to