In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:43:03 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>In the numen est nomen department - here is a humorous thought if we want to 
>get away from “ZPE” as being too overwrought: not that it is any easier to 
>accept “DCE” or “polarizable vacuum”… but if we want to specify something 
>specific like a dynamical Casimir effect for the road… well no… not 
>Fahrvergnügen, but close. Given the lore of zero point: the long history, the 
>Higgs field, the Einstein-Stern-Planck connection, the Sci-Fi nature of it all 
>– we could always revisit Einstein’s original terminology: Nullpunktsenergie.

"Null-punkts-energie" is quite literally "zero-point-energy" or ZPE.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to