Daniel, I apologize. As I wrote the message, your contribution was
indented. That was somehow lost. Looking carefully, I see that the
quotation marker is missing from your intented material in my
original copy, and then the indent itself disappears from what
appeared in Vortex. I'm not sure I understand this. Now providing an
quoted text marker, here is what I intended to write:
At 04:25 PM 8/4/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Daniel Rocha <<mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
I just noticed that Krivit used his death to promote WL theory...
He also put himself front and center in someone else's obituary,
which is bad form.
Jed used indent, probably a tab, rather than quote level indicator,
and what I had was simply automatically copied from him (by hitting Reply).
I was, however, somewhat disagreeing with you as well. I don't see
Krivits action there as fairly characterized as attempting to promote
WL theory. Just as him saying what was important to him. But I went
into this in detail in my response.
At 08:01 PM 8/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Abd, I didn`t complain about the format. That was Jed`s part. I
don`t know why his comment is doing beside mine in your quote.
2012/8/5 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com>
At 04:25 PM 8/4/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Daniel Rocha <<mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
I just noticed that Krivit used his death to promote WL theory...
He also put himself front and center in someone else's obituary,
which is bad form.
I'm going to disagree. If this was the only obituary, okay, bad
form. But this is Krivit's blog, and he has a story which is
important to him. If we were to buy that New Energy Times is some
kind of neutral publication, objectively reporting, it would be a
problem. But this isn't even a formal NET issue. It's his blog entry.
[etc.]
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
<mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>danieldi...@gmail.com
