I keep wondering who else might have accumulated data that could be
analyzed. I.e. who might have collected data from a long-lived source under
consistent conditions over a long enough period of time. Maybe monitoring
equipment from cold war era waste sites.

Jeff

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I suggest shielding the radioactive source from electromagnetic fields
> (using a tempest cage), then see if the rates still change or remain the
> constant.
> Cheers:   Axil
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 3:24 PM, David L Babcock <ol...@rochester.rr.com>wrote:
>
>>  An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below:
>>
>> [seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs.
>>
>> “It isn’t just solar flares that seem to induce changes in radioactive
>> decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and activity, *and the Earth’s
>> position on its orbital path around the Sun also appear to have an effect
>> *, and it’s the latter variable which seems to have been decisive in the
>> research. Between July 2005 and June 2011, continued monitoring has
>> apparently shown consistent annual variation in the decay rate of chlorine
>> 36, peaking in January and February, and ebbing in July and
>> August.”(Emphasis added)
>> Read more: NEW DETECTION METHOD FOR SOLAR FLARES: VARIATIONS IN
>> RADIATION 
>> EMISSION<http://gizadeathstar.com/2012/08/new-detection-method-for-solar-flares-variations-in-radiation-emission/#ixzz25FHEeuxf>
>>
>> - Giza Death Star Community
>>
>>
>> This really rang my chimes, as I had read -a month or two ago?-  that the
>> existence of the ether has some good evidence for it, and that measurements
>> showed that the solar system is moving through this ether at IIRC 4,000
>> km/hr, towards (some point).
>> If these two hideous heresies should turn out to agree the whole edifice
>> of modern physics may crumble.
>>
>>
>> I wish I could provide a link to the ether article, it was a peach,
>> giving (?) ten anomalous stick-in-your-eye findings that physics won't look
>> at.
>>
>> Ol' Bab, who was an engineer
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to