The Fermi-Acceleration in Ahern's theory may appear in many forms - perhaps Casimir/Vacuum energy is relevant in some cases.
Ahern elaborates his theory in presentation notes at URL - http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/12/brian-ahern-talk-on-energy-localization.html and in his patent application at - http://www.ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/wo2011123338a1.pdf -- Lou Pagnucco Roarty, Francis X wrote: > Oops .. the second paragraph was original draft but since I forgot to > delete it will have to expand on where it was headed literally further > down the temporal rabbit hole.. > What IF... the narrowest regions of Casimir geometry are the opposite of > an event horizon where instead of time coming to a near standstill from > our perspective it instead beats along at epochs at a time for every > second from our perspective? The question I posit is what happens to the > photons being emitted from spontaneous emission - as they climb the > stretched fabric of space time out of the Casimir/relativistic well do > they pile up? > > > > > RE: [Vo]:Ahern's ILENRS-12 Presentation - "Energy Localization" > > Roarty, Francis X > Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:03:59 -0700 > > On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:43 PM Jones Beene said [snip] However, > it > > is during a local excursion that a secondary reaction can occur, > > which does indeed violate CoE, to the extent it is gainful in > itself.[/snip] > > Agreed, and nature being what it is you would also expect an equal loss > for > > excursions in the opposite direction where reactions that should have > occurred > > at nominal are instead delayed. My posit being that Casimir geometry and > > lattices perform double duty when gas atoms are introduced, In addition to > > segregating the pressure / breaking the isotropy they also confine the gas > > molecules in a biased manner to one of these segregated regions as > compared to > > the other. I think this is why we have claims of both accelerated > radioactive > > decay and delayed radioactive decay based on the gas and metals used. > > Fran > > > > > > performing double duty by scaling and segregating these normally > unexploitable > > forces from below the Planck scale and also exhibiting confinement > properties > > toward diffusing gas molecules such that reactions occurring in these > balanced > > zones do not simply cancel out. I sometimes wonder if time dilation > introduces > > another option to the standard mass to energy consideration where energy > is > > obtained via accelerated aging of the gas atoms? Would the spontaneous > > emissions of an atom over an epoch be able to pile up on a temporally > > Fran > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:43 PM > > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Ahern's ILENRS-12 Presentation - "Energy > > Localization" > > > > Ahern under-emphasizes the "super-radiance" and "sub-radiance" balance in > > this paper. If he had made DPSR clear, then there is no primary violation. > > > > DPSR - Dicke-Preparata super-radiance - proposes that certain spatial > areas > > can undergo intense semi-coherent energy excursions (localized energy > > extremes) which are nominally perfectly balanced against adjoining areas, > > where kinetics are correspondingly muted. At this primary level there is > no > > gain. > > > > However, it is during a local excursion that a secondary reaction can > occur, > > which does indeed violate CoE, to the extent it is gainful in itself. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com > > > > His example of spring coupled point masses seems to circumvent the 2nd Law > > of Thermodynamics, by focusing rather than diffusing kinetic energy. > > > > As in endothermic chemical reactions, this is (probably) just an apparent > > violation of the 2nd Law, except occurring at nuclear/particle scales. > > > > > >
