I was not surprised about the article on nano silicon releasing 
hundreds of times more hydrogen from water, but  it makes me wonder if there is 
an inexpensive method to make nano geometry from these other LENR candidates 
like Nitol. We know that nano powders can be pyrophoric and poisonous to the 
touch but I think that is a qualification indicative of the process we are 
seeking. Below Jones cites the cooling anomalies also associated with these 
effects and I find myself wondering once again if this anomaly absolutely 
REQUIRES loading to scale up the effect.. I posit this is  a thermal power 
source created by a  Maxwellian demon that concentrates a heat generating 
environment inside the Casimir cavity while an opposite environment is 
dispersed over the external landscape - this would allow the size of the gas 
atoms to determine which environment they favor in a biased manner while the 
geometry already discriminates against one spatial axis... It is a natural 
segregator of gas atoms powered by HUP/gas motion. It appears to be violating 
the rule that we can not exploit energy from random gas motion and IMHO  places 
a caveat on how we should consider COE and overunity with respect to Casimir 
geometry. Note I don't have to dig into the virtual particles or suppression to 
simply label it a thermal segregation environment and still come away with an 
obvious need to load down a thermal power source before it is activated or you 
will destroy the geometry.
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:30 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:new experiment (nitinol)

Jack,
Nitinol is a interesting choice since both nickel and titanium are proton 
conductors with a history of positive results in LENR - and the wire is 
commonly available. Plus there is the strange "memory" effect (which could be 
utilized for audible resonance).
It appears from your other pages that you've done simple calorimetry to see if 
there is evidence of thermal gain using nickel, tungsten etc. Even though those 
results were apparently inconclusive, does Nitinol appear to give markedly 
different results from the others?
I said "different" instead of better - since it should be mentioned that in 
Ahern's testing for EPRI there was another anomaly - cooling. IIRC it was an 
alloy of nickel and titanium (embedded in zirconia) which provided the 
appearance of endotherm - the mysterious disappearance of input energy. It 
might help to do an acid etch of the wire as the endotherm is associated with 
nano-porosity (and Casimir - which can be both an attractive force or repellent 
- depending on geometry changes)
If you were seeking anomalous endotherm, which could be equally important 
(theoretically) to gainful exotherm, the experiment would probably need 
different parameters - such as lower voltage DC and surface treatment for 
nanostructure - but it could be worth the effort.
Adding energy to achieve a lower thermal state may seem to be counterproductive 
at first glance, but perhaps it is the one detail that will make everything 
understandable.
There was a bit of evidence that the quantumheat.org folks saw a bit of 
endotherm and were trying to explain it way - rather than to deal with it as 
part of the package of Ni-H oddities.
Jones
From: Jack Cole
I've been conducting a new series of electrolysis experiments with Nitinol (56% 
nickel/44% titanium).  I did a little video demonstrating nitinol's effect of 
contracting when heated while running an electrolysis experiment.  I'm using 
KOH as the electrolyte.
May be of interest to some here.  Seems to me that this alloy may be promising 
for LENR.
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2013/01/23/automated-android-electrolysis-system-nitinol-demonstration/

Best regards,
Jack

Reply via email to