On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Commenting on the content of the Nasa patent as follows: > > ‘The material system may comprise a metal hydride. > > The electrically-conductive material may be in a form selected from the > group consisting of particles and whiskers.’ > > Clearly the theory that this revelation implies is apparent. Nasa even uses > the word Polarition in its patent; what can be more obvious? > > I was about to castigate an eminent LENR researcher and experimentalist for > not seeing the truth in this insight from Nasa and configure an experiment > to validate this concept. > > Then a rare attack of prudence came over me; before I asked others to do > something, how would I go about doing it myself? > > First, the answer to the LENR puzzle is centralized in the formation of > micro-particles with whiskers on them. > > But then I contemplated; how would I do what I wanted others to do; that is, > to produce the optimum particle configuration? This is a congenital problem > that the theorists have. That is, understanding the practical challenges > that the experimentalists face. > > A crack and a whisker are identically the same topologically. We can create > cracks by manufacturing whiskers on or nanorods coating the surface of a > micro-particle. > > Between the whiskers, cracks are formed.
here is something about nickel whiskers click "Look inside" http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1018549318109?LI=true# Harry
