Dennis, the CMNS group is the proper forum. Would you explain what you
are proposing there?
Ed
On Mar 6, 2013, at 9:07 AM, DJ Cravens wrote:
The current system I am working off of is at 0.25 to 1 W with no
input. This is with about 25 grams
of sample (density about 3 gm/ml - metal in C). This is in a heavy
metal sphere with gas pressure
generated in situ and sealed. The temperature is near room temp when
not insulated.
Higher power densities can be reached by stimulation but at the
expense of COP.
I am hoping that there will be a trade off of volume/surface area,
stimulation and COP,
heat generation and power extraction.
Part of the problem is making a simple "variable heat path" so that
power extraction and
working temperature are balanced.
But I have likely said too much- this is not the proper forum for
such things. With luck
I will have a poster at ICCF for specifics. (But it will likely be
ignored like my high temp
metal/gas was at DC).
Dennis
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:00:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley Arpa-E startup project reloaded! vote for
for 10 days.. hurry up
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
.......
I prefer to try to take only a step of a factor of 10 or so with the
LENR part . . .
Where would that bring you in terms of power, temperature and power
density?
- Jed
