On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Going by peer-reviewed literature, it's almost stopped now. > ***I see you're changing your stance. Earlier you said it had stopped. > > Always be careful of context, semantics, and qualifiers. In the context of giving credit for debunking, I said the field was already dead, and the credit had been given. So, yes, in the perception of the mainstream, the field is dead. But, going by the peer-reviewed literature, there is manifestly still some activity, but it has almost stopped. Happy? What's left now are only the mentally feeble and the scammers. > ***Dr. Arrata is a mental giant compared to you. > > At least I know how to spell his name. He has considerable stature, yes. I don't know how much of that is justified, but it is certainly not due to his work in cold fusion. Anyway, compared the Gell-Mann, Weinberg, Glashow, Lederman, Hawking, Seaborg, he doesn't stack up so well.
