Joshua:
Don't you find the following scenario just a little disconcerting.
For 24 years the scientific community has been certain (to the point of
claiming that "Cold Fusion" was pseudoscience" that the anomalous heat found by
P & F was delusion. They now have tests clearly demonstrating the effect which
they can only explain away by proposing acts of fraud. And before they should
consider them in any way you feel it is necessary for the entrepreneur (clearly
not a scientists) to demonstrate it in public so that there can be NO doubt.
How foolish do you want the world's scientific community to look? Wouldn't it
be better for the scientific community to get on top of it now and either help
prove it to the world or expose the fraud?
I find your point of view incomprehensible.
Ransom
----- Original Message -----
From: Joshua Cude
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pekka Janhunen analysis supports the reported
underestimation of radiated power
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:05 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
You are letting your emotions influence your thinking. Try to keep an
open mind for a change
No, that's you. Cold fusion would benefit everyone, so emotionally I'd like
it to be true, but I'm rational.
You, on the other hand, are completely governed by your deep desire for cold
fusion to be real, that you can't think straight. Try to keep an open mind for
a change, and realize that cold fusion is almost certainly bogus.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2242 / Virus Database: 3184/5863 - Release Date: 05/28/13
