On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:38 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I'll ask the question a different way: > > Is there any explanation offered, even if only in an interview, by the > researchers as to why they did not use normal calorimetry? > > > In the December run, the experiment was already running, so there was clearly no opportunity. They did not change very much for the March run, so the most likely explanation is that the option was not available, since it would clearly involve some modification to the ecat, but this is obviously speculation.
