On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Put yourself in the shoes of those 7 scientists who have placed their >>> reputations on the line. >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I don't think it's a big risk. They can plausibly claim ignorance. In >> fact their ignorance is the most plausible explanation. >> > ***No, the most plausible explanation in the light of 14,700 replications > of the P-F Anomalous Heat Effect is that the effect is real and Rossi has > found a way to generate it more reliably. > > We had this conversation about those replications, and you believe > that every single one of them was an error, which has been shown to be more > than 4500 ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE demonstrably incorrect and impossible. > > No, you don't know your mathematics, because that's like saying that the chance of rolling 10 sixes out of 60 dice is (1/6)^10. It's nonsense.
