Robert, Please forgive me for responding to Cude and perhaps allowing his non sense to escape the filter. I will restrict that situation from this point forth. I feel badly for how I have contributed to this mess, but he was directly attacking me and I hated to just stand by and let his inputs escape rebuttal.
My responses to Cude are hereby reduced to near zero since he offers little to the discussions. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Robert Ellefson <vortex-h...@e2ke.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Jun 4, 2013 12:17 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Over 40 messages posted by Joshua Cude posted on June 4 > ... at what point does this incessant (IMO) kind posting behavior considered > a nuisance and hindrance to on-going Vortex discussions? Now, if Cude is > genuinely making a good contribution I’ll have nothing more to say on > this matter. But it would be interesting to hear a consensus on how much > of a genuine contribution Cude is allegedly making - from other Vort members. Now that I am subscribed to the list, I have the ability to filter people such as Cude directly. However, there is no reasonable means of filtering the large volume of useless responses to his postings. So, as when I read the vortex web archives only, I am left to scan for names I recognize that I suspect may have something to contribute through the noise. This is tedious and fundamentally error-prone. The result is that I typically delete en masse the majority of related discussions. I don't Because I quickly elected to simply ignore pseudo-skeptics such as Cude, I cannot make specific claims as to the contents of his posts, only that I do not care to read them. However, I can claim that his posts are in fact quite disruptive to the flow of discussion and hence to the purpose of this list. If I were moderating this list, I would not tolerate it. -Robert
