Does this imply that the Tunguska event caused the idiocy of the Soviet Union, or set the stage for it.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:07 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Our atmosphere is basically Nitrogen(N2), Oxygen(O2) and Water Vapor(H2O). > I believe the nuclei(vacuum energy) of that Tunguska Brane orbited through > the Earth and jet streams for months afterward and ionized all of the > molecules I mentioned previously, Creating NH3 and NH4NO3, O3, NOx and > such. It is the great ionizer and condenser of all matter and is at the > heart of LENR. > > I have also been studying the dark ages and it appears something similar > happened to the atmosphere back then in addition to the rampant disease > that spread, lots of fireballs, foul air, floods, etc killing tens of > millions across Europe and Asia. I talked with the Professor/Author of one > of the books that imply a comet or other celestial object(s) was a trigger, > not to say that the opportunistic plague did not contribute. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Baillie > Upon examining the tree-ring record, Baillie noticed indications of severe > environmental downturns around 2354 BC, 1628 BC, 1159 BC, 208 BC, and AD > 540. The evidence suggests that these environmental downturns were > wide-ranging catastrophic events; the AD 540 event in particular is > attested in tree-ring chronologies from > Siberia<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberia> > through Europe <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe> and > North<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_America> > and South America <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_America>. This > event coincides with the second largest ammonium signal in the Greenland > ice in the last two millennia, the largest being in AD 1014, and both these > epochs were accompanied by cometary apparitions. Baillie explains the > general absence of mainstream historical references to this event by the > fact it was described in terms of biblical metaphors since at that time > "Christian beliefs included the dogma that nothing that happens in the > heavens could have any conceivable effect on the > Earth."[1]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Baillie#cite_note-1> > > 1811 also had a 7 year climate downturn after the visit by the Great Comet > of 1811 (and the New Madrid Earthquakes in Dec 1811) > > I don't think our rock and snowball model of the universe works very well. > Something is energetic enough to ionize "inert" molecules. I think it is > the vacuum energy within these energetic "particles" > > I believe those billions of tons of CME's that miss us, which I think are > mostly collapsed matter, end up here collecting dust > http://www.universetoday.com/32515/kuiper-belt/ > > And then gradually hit us in the head every once in awhile as they are > pulled in to the inner solar system. These are mostly electromagnetic and > gravitational branes spit out from the Sun in my book, which is just a 5 > dimensional brane herself. > > I am mostly interested since we will be passing through comet ISON's tail > in Jan 2014. Many comet tails do cause meteor showers annually and > something "unusual" is expected from ISON. > http://www.space.com/20859-comet-ison-new-meteor-shower.html > > Stewart > darkmattersalot. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> Thanks for the citation, Stewart. I was not aware that the Tunguska >> event and Younger Dryas had already been connected via ammonia >> concentration found in ice cores. And it is most intriguing that a special >> type of higher energy event could be responsible for both. They speculate: >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> “An analog of the Haber process with hydrogen contributed by cometary or >> surface water, atmospheric nitrogen, high pressures, and possibly catalytic >> iron from a comet could in principle produce ammonia…”**** >> >> ** ** >> >> But the kind of energy necessary to produce the amount of nitrates seen – >> is apparently absent. Since there has been no mention of significant >> radioactivity – and given there is like to be massive “extra” gain above >> the physics of normal atmospheric impact dynamics, then LENR should not be >> ruled out as a contributing source of energy for such events.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I wonder if the recent Russian meteor at Chelyabinsk produced significant >> ammonia or other nitrates and if it too contained Lonsdaleite and nickel? >> Many hits turn up on google, as expected - but nothing conclusive that I >> have seen. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> A cross-connection between three factors: nitrates in the atmosphere, >> Lonsdaleite carbon and nickel in the bolide, and the lack of large debris >> evidence (indicative of an atmospheric explosion) would be interesting for >> further speculation based on the possibility of how perhaps 10 times more >> energy than can otherwise be accounted for. (notice how many times the >> estimated of the size of the Chelyabinsk meteor was raised based solely on >> the energy, and not the visual evidence).**** >> >> ** ** >> >> In short, if Chelyabinsk was really that large, there should have been >> prior notice in the ongoing surveys, and if it was comparatively small, as >> seems to be the case, then the extra energy could have come from a >> non-nuclear source involving hydrogen and nano-porosity.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* ChemE Stewart **** >> >> ** ** >> >> At the time of Tunguska, something also increased the levels of Ammonia >> and Ammonium Nitrate in the atmosphere to significant levels as shown in >> ice cores. **** >> >> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907.1067.pdf**** >> >> ** ** >> >> My bet is that the Tunguska "meteorite" had a LENR/vacuum energy core and >> was actually a BRANE per M Theory, just like a comet. They ionize the air >> in their surroundings. If rocks can generate 10-15 megatons (up to 1000 >> times Hiroshima) in the atmosphere without hitting anything why do we need >> nuclear weapons?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Stewart**** >> >> darkmattersalot.com**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Story with many implications, real or imaginary: >> >> >> >> http://www.nature.com/news/rock-samples-suggest-meteor-caused-tunguska-blast >> -1.13163?WT.ec_id=NEWS-20130611<http://www.nature.com/news/rock-samples-suggest-meteor-caused-tunguska-blast%0d%0a-1.13163?WT.ec_id=NEWS-20130611> >> >> "Researchers from Ukraine say that they have found a smoking gun for the >> Tunguska event," and it is a small fragment from an iron-nickel-carbon >> meteor that could have caused the half-megaton blast, leaving few traces. >> The study is published in Planetary and Space Science. >> >> Hold on ... there is more... including the possibility of a Rossi/ LENR >> connection! <g> >> >> Aside from the enormity of the blast and the lack large rock debris, there >> is an overlooked factoid - the samples which have been found contain an >> exotic form of carbon called Lonsdaleite - which is somewhere between >> graphite and diamond ... and can be nanoporous. There has been prior >> speculation on carbon - in some exotic form or another, as being part of >> the >> Rossi secret catalyst... otherwise this Tunguska story is not exactly on >> topic. >> >> This particular form of carbon was found at another special impact site - >> which also relates to a pivotal period at the end of the last ice age, >> around 11-13 thousand years ago which is steeped in mythology (the demise >> of >> the Clovis culture, the rise of the Gobekli Tepe culture, Atlantis, the >> flood of Noah, etc). Lonsdaleite has been found as nano-crystals embedded >> in >> iron-nickel and dated to this exact time period at Lake Cutizeo near >> Guanajuato, Mexico, supportive of the controversial Younger Dryas impact >> hypothesis. That was presumed to be a massive explosion, since melt-glass >> from it was found as far away as Syria. >> >> Lonsdaleite is an allotrope of carbon with a hexagonal lattice. The >> crystal >> lattice, is harder and stronger than diamond and usually embedded in an >> iron-nickel matrix, and there is the important nano-geometry (it is called >> nano-diamond), and the fact that many meteors contain ice, methane and >> hydrogen - all of which, taken together with a larger than expected >> explosion ... >> >> hmmm... maybe it is a bit surprising that the Pentagon hasn't taken an >> active interest in the HotCat... or maybe they have. >> >> Jones >> >> **** >> >> ** ** >> > >
