Positive Control<http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2013/06/positive-control-means-the-end-of-freedom.html>
When something is very dangerous, like nuclear weapons, standard forms of protections and control methodologies aren't sufficient. [image: Hardtack_Umbrella_nuke]<http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451576d69e201901dadf09c970b-pi> Something that potentially dangerous needs something more aggressive. In the military, that's called *positive control*. Positive control is an active form of control where the dangerous item is under 24x7x365 monitoring, checking, patrolling, testing, etc. ... read more at the link above They can't help themselves because they're too stupid to realize passive control is the only form of control that is robustly stable. They probably can't realize this because they can't even conceive of passive control systems -- sort of like the idiots who gave us civilian nuclear reactors derived from those designed for nuclear submarines can't conceive of why they're responsible for the failure to achieve even a tiny fraction of of atomic energy's peaceful potential.
