Jones, Where was that claim made?
did they mean uT? Stewart On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* Jack Cole **** > > ** ** > > 1) Brillouin Energy's method of electrolysis would seem likely to elevate > the cathode temperature >179C. Could this be a factor in Godes' success?* > *** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > It is looking like there is nothing there with Brillouin. Months ago, they > received a very large grant for testing at SRI. It’s a pretty good bet that > if anything had turned up in that testing (and it should have turned up > weeks ago if it was there) –some news would have surfaced at ICCF, formally > or informally. **** > > ** ** > > In fact, the local rumors are that there has been no glimmer of success at > all.**** > > ** ** > > The most surprising detail to come out of the whole conference IMHO - if > it can be believed - is the report of the very high magnetic field of DGT. > **** > > ** ** > > Other prior experiments which showed a well-define trigger temperature, > such as Ahern’s - showed much higher trigger than ~180C, but he had no > significant magnetic field at all. That low trigger temp could be related > to the high field – if DGT are to be believed.**** > > ** ** > > In fact, the fact that this kind of field strength is easy to document - > but was not documented - casts significant doubt on the entire DGT > presentation. **** > > ** ** > > Many of us who were bullish on that demo a few days ago have shifted 180 > degrees and are not skeptical simply because of this claim of 1.6 Tesla. It > is almost preposterous. That kind of field at 20 cm from the device (their > claim) would be pulling tools from across the room.**** > > ** ** > > Jones**** >
