Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: Does anyone else see that the explanation given by Godes is pure word salad > having no relationship to reality. The description is in direct and basic > conflict with what is known and accepted in science.
I do not know enough about theory to judge that. Here is what I do know though. I had a long pizza dinner with these people and several other others. During this meal, I tried repeatedly to pin them down to some specifics about the calorimetry and the nature of the equipment. I did not want to know trade secrets. I wanted to know how big, how hot, how many watts in, how many out, how long has it run, how did they measure it. I got nothing. Nuuu-thing but blah blah blah about theory and about their earlier unrelated technical triumphs. That gave me a bad feeling. Maybe there are specifics in this video. I have not watched the whole thing. I can't abide any more blather. I heard hours of that already. - Jed
