Ketchum's web site was hacked around the same time that Sasquatch got a real name of Homo sapiens cognatus.
http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2013/10/east_texas_researcher_who_prov.php On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://dnadiagnostics.com/press.html > > "The genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to > modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA is a novel, unknown hominin > related to Homo sapiens and other primate species. Our data indicate > that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of > males of an unknown hominin species crossing with female Homo > sapiens." > > <end excerpt> > > Actually both a Russian lab and the one above came to the same > conclusion. However: > > http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/bigfoot-dna/ > > "The hair samples that contain only human mtDNA are from a human. The > samples from which the nuDNA is isolated are also from humans but with > some contaminants or some other animal source mixed in. That seems to > be a more parsimonious interpretation. I would like to know more about > the source of the DNA, but I guess that will have to wait for the full > details to be published. The fact that the human DNA is modern human > (hence the need for the alleged hybridization to have occurred so > recently in the past) is most easily explained as the source simply > being modern humans." > > <end excerpt> > > This could get really interesting. What "unidentified hominid" could > have mated with a human female 15,000 years ago considering they have > excluded known hominids? >
