Indeed, it was the U of Michigan crew.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Was this old story related to the grant in question ? > > > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100422153943.htm > > > > Not sure how this “new” technology from PNNL is very different. > > > > > > *From:* James Bowery > > > > Coincidentally I had just, literally a minute ago, sent off a query about > this PNNL work to some coinvestigators in a grant proposal to the DoE for > the production of biocrude because the PNNL process sounded so similar, I > wanted to find out if there was any distinction. > > > > The biggest problem remains the sufficiently economic production of > biomass -- and to the best of my knowledge after looking at that problem > for the past 20 years -- there is only one technology capable for that. > > > > Brad Lowe wrote: > > Some links: > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131218100141.htm > > http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/12/18/Scientists-Manufacture-Crude-Oil-The-End-of-Peak-Oil > http://www.genifuel.com/ > > >
