>
> Mills mentions hydrino about 100 times in this latest patent application.
> If this quantum state of the electron is not found to exist as defined in
> his patent, is the patent still valid?


He's probably either pretty confident it exists or he doesn't really care
about the patent and it's just there for show.


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://www.google.com/patents/EP2548257A2?cl=en
>
> You should not mention theory in a patent.
>
> Mills mentions hydrino about 100 times in this latest patent application.
> If this quantum state of the electron is not found to exist as defined in
> his patent, is the patent still valid?
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote:
>
>> Clearly Nigel, a variety nuclear reactions can occur depending on applied
>> energy and the conditions. Hot fusion occurs at the upper end of this range
>> even in plasma. Cold fusion occurs at the lower end of this range in  a NAE
>> only within solids. Between these two extremes, a variety of reactions
>> occur in solids and in plasma.  BLP has focused their attention on forming
>> the hydrino, not on nuclear reactions, although the conditions will clearly
>> cause nuclear reactions.
>>
>> But, to properly focus a discussion, the term LENR refers to nuclear
>> reactions that occur only at low applied energy in a solid structure.
>>
>> Ed Storms
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Nigel Dyer wrote:
>>
>>  I was not aware of anything in the definition of LENR that says that it
>> has to be solid state.   Some of the better public examples at the moment
>> are solid state, but I am aware of other systems that appear to be low
>> energy nuclear reactions which appear to use other substrates, and I see no
>> reason to have to invent a different term just because it is a different
>> substrate.
>>
>> As for BLP, the information seems to be designed to be both informative
>> and misleading, which appears to be almost a defining characteristic of LENR
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>> On 14/01/2014 16:07, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> If they put 1,200 amps in at lets say 100 volts that is 120 KW.   Its is
>> an electrical fault.  I seen this action and yes it will explode.
>>   There device is not sold state.  LENR is a sold state reaction.  I am
>> not convinced.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> <danieldi...@gmail.com>
>> To: CMNS <c...@googlegroups.com> <c...@googlegroups.com>
>> Cc: VORTEX <vortex-l@eskimo.com> <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>> Sent: Tue, Jan 14, 2014 10:52 am
>> Subject: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: BLP's announcement
>>
>>  1) This part:
>>
>>  10 billion watts/10,000 of a liter = 1MW
>>
>>  2)This part:
>>
>>  "The disclosure of one of BlackLight’s patent application that was
>> recently-filed worldwide, its 10 MW electric SF-CIHT cell system
>> engineering design and simulation, high-speed video of millions of watts of
>> supersonically expanding SF-CIHT cell plasma,"
>>
>>  Suppose it a video that has a less than 1us per frame, in spikes. So,
>> they are claiming 1 or less joule for a few some spikes. That might be even
>> an error or measurement...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014/1/14 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> This, this time seems to be remarkable progress-
>>> if true:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.financialpost.com/markets/news/BlackLight+Power+Announces+Game+Changing+Achievement+Generation+Millions/9384649/story.html
>>>
>>>  Let's see- Mike Carrell remained BLP's faithful supporter.
>>> Not LENR, but energy
>>>
>>>  Peter
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Dr. Peter Gluck
>>> Cluj, Romania
>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>>>   --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "CMNS" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to cmns+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to c...@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cmns.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>> danieldi...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to