That last years independent (thx jed!) report was accurate and it's caused by nuclear rather than some sort of chemical reaction or hidden wires.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > At what exactly? State the conditionals in 10 pages or less. > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> So, Dave, I guess you're at .. what? 95%? 90%? >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >> >>> John, it does seem rather arbitrary how his game works and hopefully he >>> can help me understand it better. Does anyone actually risk capital on >>> this issue? >>> >>> I have seen plenty of proof that Rossi has the real deal and I can not >>> imagine how additional proof will make a difference to many others. The >>> skeptics will all howl as usual with MY taking the lead. The only way that >>> the world will accept that Rossi's ECAT is real is for them to be placed in >>> common usage. There has been more than enough evidence already >>> demonstrated. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> >>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 3:48 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to >>> 35% >>> >>> Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming >>> out of BLP and McKubre. >>> >>> Yesterday you were complaining about how stupid BLP and >>> McKubre/Brillouin are and how "annoying" they were behaving. Now you see >>> value in these reports, why? And you associate them with Rossi, why? >>> >>> You're all over the place Blaze, and your off-the-cuff guesstimating >>> is beyond arbitrary. Why not just follow your own advice from yesterday >>> and keep meaningless information yourself as well? >>> >>> Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next >>> indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report. >>> >>> Ditto. That's going to be exciting when it lands. >>> >>> Regards, >>> John >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming >>>> out of BLP and McKubre. >>>> >>>> Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next >>>> indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fulvio , the tech Director & R.D. at Leonardo Corporation MIAMI - FL - >>>>> USA previous job was: >>>>> >>>>> " Frelance >>>>> Consultant<http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&title=Frelance+Consultant&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true¤tTitle=CP&trk=prof-exp-title> >>>>> European >>>>> Gaming and Gambling Tech >>>>> Market<http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&company=European+Gaming+and+Gambling+Tech+Market&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true&trk=prof-exp-company-name> >>>>> " >>>>> >>>>> -4% >>>>> >>>>> Now back to 31%. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is based on >>>>>> >>>>>> - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >>>>>> - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >>>>>> - Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) >>>>>> - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >>>>>> >>>>>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. Could be >>>>>> updating this probability more frequently. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
