Then it is easy to see how someone like JT He who reviewed the evidence could come up with 14000 replications.
Let's say that, using Ed's figure of 1060 reports, that an average of 14 cells were successful for each experiment. That would get you the 14000 figure very quickly. And I've seen indications that some of these guys were getting more than a hundred cells to work. On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see it all over the place that "hundreds of times" it's been >> successfully replicated. Here, Storms says: "During the 20 years since >> the original claim, hundreds of successful replications have been >> published." He then goes on to look at 386 of them. >> >> >> http://fusiontorch.com/uploads/StormsJudgingValidityOfFleischmannPonsEffect2009.pdf >> > > > Let me point out that this is 386 reports, or laboratories reporting. > There are many more individual experimental runs than this. > > This paper references Storms' book, and the tables in it. It has a list, > "Reported successful FPE experiments" which begins: > > "Excess Heat, Table 2, pages 53-61, Number of Successes 184 > Tritium Production Table 6, pages 79-81, Number of Successes 61 > . . ." > > In the book, the first thing listed in Table 2 is: > > "Dardik et al. DW Iso. open electrolytic Pd, LiOD+, D2O, 1.8" > > Dardik has done hundreds of positive experiments by now. So have some of > the other groups in the list of 184 positive excess heat experiments. > > - Jed > >
