There is a performance report:
http://www.solarhydrogentrends.com/SHT_performance%20_test.pdf
I would suggest that the current figure is likely to be right, in that
100kA at 4V would require some interesting electrical enigineering, so
was the voltage actually nearer 5kV rather than 5V. Again however 5kV
at 100A requires some interesting electrical engineering. A picture of
the setup would clarify
Nigel
On 15/03/2014 16:22, Bob Higgins wrote:
If true, that is one heck of a claim - they would be claiming an
over-unity COP of 443 (44300%).
I checked the math. 2797 SCF of H2 - IS - equivalent to 221.5 kWH.
What I think is probably wrong is the 500W input - it must be a typo.
They must mean 500kW input. This would put their COP to be 44.3%
which is still good and is not an over-unity claim.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Solar Hydrogen Trends claim:
Input 500 watts produces 2,797 cu.ft. H2 per hour, equivalent to
221.5 KWhr at a cost of $1.80
http://www.solarhydrogentrends.com/
