If the Rossi has the proper control of his device established and positive thermal feedback of adequate gain is achieved then the COP should not be an issue. It will be difficult to control the system if thermal delays dominate the feedback timing or other variables complicate the transfer of heat away from the core. In these situations I would be more concerned about keeping the COP low enough to avoid thermal runaway.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Fri, Apr 11, 2014 10:22 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi long term test Yes. Sweden is the rumor fortesting – which does not come from Lewan, but his book indicates that heknows more than he is free to tell. Uppsala has definite motivation, given the peercriticism of the prior report. They would like to clear their name with abetter report. Another rumor today isthat the level of gain (COP) is closer to Mizuno than to Rossi’s priordemos. Those prior demos were criticized for measurement technique (wet steametc). Many observers hope theCOP is at least 4. If it is 2.5 instead of 4, then we will not be looking atmoving to commercialization on a rapid pace. From:Alan Fletcher Sweden, most likely Uppsala.
