Jones, I think you may be mis-identifying the effects of the magnetic field in a DDL atom. By the same token that the interior magnetic field would increase as the electron orbital radius shrinks, the external magnetic field shrinks as r^-3 as r gets bigger. Thus, at the normal atomic radius, the magnetic field will be largely the same for a DDL as a normal ground state hydrogen.
When it comes to affecting the approach of two DDL atoms, the magnetic field dipole would cause the two atoms to align N pole to S pole and may cause them to bind! Further, and I would have to think about this more carefully, if the interior magnetic field is increased, it may increase the coupling between the nucleus and the electron - could that possibly allow energy exchange between the electron and the nucleus? Could the enhanced magnetic field attraction help initiate a cold fusion? I certainly don't think the possibility of fusion is dead. I absolutely do NOT discount helium formation in deuterium LENR. The Arata work shows 4He forming in a clean deuterium gas LENR cell using zirconia - Pd nanopowders. To get measurable 4He you need significant D-D fusion to have occurred. DDL without fusion cannot explain this. That doesn't mean that other DDL effects may not be occurring and these may be used just as we use other chemical energy. Of course, this is exactly what Mills is trying to leverage. Getting 100x or 1000x over existing chemical reactions would be hugely beneficial. However, LENR at 1,000,000x would be even better. Bob Higgins P.S.: Terry, Thank you for posting Vavra's presentation. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > Sooner or later, CMNS will also pick up on a most important factoid about > the DDL – which has been mentioned here many times – which is its increased > magnetic field intensity (and its negative near field – which actually > prohibits nuclear fusion) – but who needs fusion !?! > > Answer: no one needs fusion for LENR and “cold fusion” is dead. We have a > ready-made source of energy in DDL without fusion! As to whether this > source > is real nuclear energy - is not of greatest concern for the immediate > future. We have identified what is likely to be the proximate cause of LENR > and it will not long until this is tied (most likely through nanomagnetism > and spin coupling) to the ultimate cause. > > The magnetic field of an atom of hydrogen or deuterium, based on the single > electron, when aligned in a fixed vector is 12.5 T at the circumference of > the atom. On shrinkage from approximately 50 pm to .1 pm in radius, the DDL > has an increased magnetic field of 500^2 or a factor of 250,000 times > greater field intensity. The electric near field would be a similar > increase. That is too much to overcome for actual fusion, but again – we do > not need fusion since the energy from the DDL state is thousands of times > greater than chemical. > > Jones > > > > >