Can you tell us exactly what he said, minus your interpretation?

Jojo


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Frank Acland 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:43 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers


  No, nothing about that.



  On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Thanks for the clarification Frank.  Did the tester indicate to you 
privately the reason for the delay, even if it is something they don't want to 
say in public?


    Jojo


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Frank Acland 
      To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
      Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:45 AM
      Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers


      Sorry, I just found this thread -- I didn't realize there was such 
controversy going on. 


      The term 'polarized opinions' was in reference to people on the outside 
-- not among the testers. 


      Frank



      On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:26 PM, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:

        It seems there are polarized opinions on the meaning of 'polarized 
opinions'. 
        From the standpoint of an optimist it could mean the polarized opinions 
of the outside world, but from the standpoint of a pessimist it could mean the 
polarized opinions of the testers. Someone could ask Frank Acland to clarify 
the meaning.


        Harry



        On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

          Dave, you and I picked up on the most important phrase that others 
seems to have missed - "Polarized Opinions".  This by itself has got to refer 
to opinions of the testers, not the outside world.  For why would the polarized 
opinions of the outside world suddenly make a difference in the release of the 
TIP2 report?  The outside world opinion has always been polarized since the 
beginning, why make a difference now? especially in the context of the TIP2 
release date?


          Jojo


            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: David Roberson 
            To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
            Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:28 AM
            Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers


            Jojo, I hope you are wrong about your conclusion.  It does concern 
me by the expression of "Polarized opinions".   Best case is for them to be 
referring to how the device operates instead of how well it works.

            Dave







            -----Original Message-----
            From: Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com>
            To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
            Sent: Wed, Aug 20, 2014 11:29 am
            Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers


Sure, you can be optimistic and read it that way; but it seems clear in the 
context of the statements, that the "Polarized opinions" is the reason. 
Reason for what?  reason for not giving pre-statements about a timing or 
content of the report.  Why would any polarized outside opinion be the 
reason for any delay in the timing of the release? or affect the content of 
the report?

It seems clear.  The testers can not agree on what to write.   This can only 
mean some think it is positive, some think it is negative.  They can't agree 
like a hang jury.



Jojo





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Fletcher" <a...@well.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers


> From: "Jojo Iznart" <jojoiznar...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:07:08 AM
> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/20/e-cat-report-watch-thread/
> As reported in e-catworld. It seems the TIP2 testers are having a lot of 
> disagreements; hence the delay in the release of the report. This does not 
> bode well for the ECat. I have been one of a few that think too many 
> warning flags have been seen lately regarding the ECat. Chances of it 
> being a Scam has increased.
>
> I don't read it that way --- 
>
> "The response I received was that they realize there is a great amount of 
> interest in the report, but that because of polarized opinions surrounding 
> the LENR and E-Cat, it was not advisable to give any pre-statements about 
> the content of timing or the report."
>
> The "polarized opinions" are those in the outside world, not within the 
> team - which wants to get it right. And, quite correctly, say "nothing to 
> nobody" until the report's out.
> 








      -- 

      Frank Acland
      Publisher, E-Cat World
       





  -- 

  Frank Acland
  Publisher, E-Cat World
   

Reply via email to