Like Jed says, " Please stop making ignorant assertions." At least this is an interesting ignorant assertion. The problem with Cold Fusion acceptance in scientific circles is not due to problems getting results replicated. It is due to PAST stigma attached to the field of inquiry and current skeptopathic activity until this generation of "scientists" dies off.
*A new scientific <http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Scientific> truth <http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Truth> does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light <http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Light>, but rather because its opponents eventually die <http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Death>, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. ~Max Planck * On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jed, > > If it is a repeatable as you would like to believe, we wouldn't have so > much problems convincing the rest of the world. > > > Jojo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:45 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Accuracy of Carbon Dating > > Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Cold Fusion then is not science since it is not repeatable. >> > > Of course it is repeatable. It has been replicated thousands of times. > Please stop making ignorant assertions. Read the literature before > commenting. > > - Jed > >
