I haven't found any in Georgia or Alabama, are you sure?
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Crop circles are formed by rednecks with nothing better to do. They are > also formed by microwave beam weaponry from satellites orbiting. Once in > awhile those things need to tuned. > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:24 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> You just Unified Science and Religion! >> >> Who makes crop circles? >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yup. The bible says a day is like a thousand years to God, and a >>> thousand years is like a day. >>> >>> Science today tells us that someone travelling the speed of light (the >>> twin paradox) for a year would return to his twin back on earth, and the >>> twin would have aged 100 years. Is God restricted to the speed of light? NO >>> WAY. He no doubt travels faster than that, and so for him to spend a day on >>> creation would look like billions of years to an observer on earth. All >>> verified science. >>> >>> Think about it. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I haven't been following this thread. >>>> >>>> But can somebody please give me an estimate of the average rate of >>>> deity-formation. (That is, an omnipitent, omnipresent deity capable of >>>> creating a universe -- or maybe even a multiverse -- and then diddle with >>>> DNA over a coupla/few billion years.). >>>> >>>> Would the deity-creation rate be femto-deities per Age? Or do time and >>>> space only apply in our current universe (and are possibly emergent >>>> properties from a finer structure). >>>> >>>> The only scaling factor I can find is "But, beloved, be not ignorant of >>>> this one thing, that one day*is* with the Lord as a thousand years, >>>> and a thousand years as one day." -- but that's post-creation. >>>> >>>> The only comparable methodology I can find is the emergence of a >>>> Boltzman Brain in our current universe, which also seems statistically >>>> unlikely. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >